<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CDE is a buy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themarketfinancial.com/cde-is-a-buy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themarketfinancial.com/cde-is-a-buy/69?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cde-is-a-buy</link>
	<description>Taking the Risk out of Risk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usha Fawley</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketfinancial.com/cde-is-a-buy/69/comment-page-1#comment-150322</link>
		<dc:creator>Usha Fawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=69#comment-150322</guid>
		<description>hey there this is the info I was  trying to find, do you brain basically reveal it along with my personal viewers ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey there this is the info I was  trying to find, do you brain basically reveal it along with my personal viewers ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketfinancial.com/cde-is-a-buy/69/comment-page-1#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=69#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also a long term holder who currently plans to vote against Proposal #3 and #4.  The company has been using the shareholder as a piggy bank the past 5 years, selling stock to raise cash to fund expansion.  I&#039;ve been patiently waiting for that expansion to result in higher earnings.  The recent announcement about Mexico is encouraging.

The company should reward the shareholder with a share buyback using the new cashflows from the same expansion instead of a reverse split.  The reverse split is historically a sign of last gasp, management having no other option to raise the stock price. This is not the case with CDE.

However, I do find it interesting that the stock price spiked the day after annoucement of the split.  It does not make sense. Any idea why would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also a long term holder who currently plans to vote against Proposal #3 and #4.  The company has been using the shareholder as a piggy bank the past 5 years, selling stock to raise cash to fund expansion.  I&#8217;ve been patiently waiting for that expansion to result in higher earnings.  The recent announcement about Mexico is encouraging.</p>
<p>The company should reward the shareholder with a share buyback using the new cashflows from the same expansion instead of a reverse split.  The reverse split is historically a sign of last gasp, management having no other option to raise the stock price. This is not the case with CDE.</p>
<p>However, I do find it interesting that the stock price spiked the day after annoucement of the split.  It does not make sense. Any idea why would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Vlaicu</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketfinancial.com/cde-is-a-buy/69/comment-page-1#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vlaicu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=69#comment-172</guid>
		<description>@C.Shelton, yes it does... read my above post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@C.Shelton, yes it does&#8230; read my above post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Vlaicu</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketfinancial.com/cde-is-a-buy/69/comment-page-1#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vlaicu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=69#comment-171</guid>
		<description>@ Ed, I agree with your $5 range based on its market cap and sound future outlook especially with the new mine in Mexico. As for the reverse split...

What Does Reverse Stock Split Mean?
A reduction in the number of a corporation&#039;s shares outstanding that increases the par value of its stock or its earnings per share. The market value of the total number of shares (market capitalization) remains the same.

Investopedia explains Reverse Stock Split
For example, a 1-for-2 reverse split means you get half as many shares, but at twice the price. It&#039;s usually a bad sign if a company is forced to reverse split - firms do it to make their stock look more valuable when, in fact, nothing has changed. A company may also do a reverse split to avoid being delisted.

As many as 75% of all stocks wind up trading lower after a reverse split.

So this is def. something to keep your eyes on, if this goes through -- you  might want to sell for a few months an buy back in at a cheaper price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ed, I agree with your $5 range based on its market cap and sound future outlook especially with the new mine in Mexico. As for the reverse split&#8230;</p>
<p>What Does Reverse Stock Split Mean?<br />
A reduction in the number of a corporation&#8217;s shares outstanding that increases the par value of its stock or its earnings per share. The market value of the total number of shares (market capitalization) remains the same.</p>
<p>Investopedia explains Reverse Stock Split<br />
For example, a 1-for-2 reverse split means you get half as many shares, but at twice the price. It&#8217;s usually a bad sign if a company is forced to reverse split &#8211; firms do it to make their stock look more valuable when, in fact, nothing has changed. A company may also do a reverse split to avoid being delisted.</p>
<p>As many as 75% of all stocks wind up trading lower after a reverse split.</p>
<p>So this is def. something to keep your eyes on, if this goes through &#8212; you  might want to sell for a few months an buy back in at a cheaper price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. SHelton</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketfinancial.com/cde-is-a-buy/69/comment-page-1#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>C. SHelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=69#comment-170</guid>
		<description>What about the CDE proposal -- which is thought to be a lock to pass -- of a reverse split of 10-1.  Isn&#039;t that a serious negative?  If so, how does it figure into your assessment...does it make your assessment of CDE less positive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the CDE proposal &#8212; which is thought to be a lock to pass &#8212; of a reverse split of 10-1.  Isn&#8217;t that a serious negative?  If so, how does it figure into your assessment&#8230;does it make your assessment of CDE less positive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Aguilar</title>
		<link>http://www.themarketfinancial.com/cde-is-a-buy/69/comment-page-1#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Aguilar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=69#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Regarding your CDE post.  As a long term cde investor i share you undervalued perception, but why then their need to try and reverse split?  Once again abusing long term holders for their patience.  I will definitely vote no on proposal but firmly believe this stock should be trading at least around the 5-10 level WITHOUT the R split.  Appreciate your views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your CDE post.  As a long term cde investor i share you undervalued perception, but why then their need to try and reverse split?  Once again abusing long term holders for their patience.  I will definitely vote no on proposal but firmly believe this stock should be trading at least around the 5-10 level WITHOUT the R split.  Appreciate your views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 33/43 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 659/663 objects using memcached

Served from: www.stockshaven.com @ 2012-02-05 15:44:37 -->
